Primary Teachers’ Choices of Educational Technology

Main Article Content

Patchareeporn Wongwiriyakorn
Punyapa Saengsri

Abstract

Educational technology has been impactful on the achievement of language teaching and learning. English language teachers have applied educational technology in their own teaching for various reasons. This study aims to 1) investigate the choices of educational technology; and 2) Find reasons for such choices of primary teachers who teach English in a public school. The semi-structured interviews were collected from seven participants who were teaching at Watphrapathomchede School, Nakhon Pathom. The interview data were analyzed by using frequency counts to find the chosen educational technologies and thematic analyses to classify the reasons into themes. The results revealed that 1) televisions, computers, and YouTube had been chosen by all seven of the participants; and 2) pedagogical objectives and institutional decisions were the two main reasons given by these primary teachers for their choices of educational technology in use.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519-546.

Balas, P. (2020). Significant of smartphone: An educational technology tool for teaching and learning. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(5), 1634-1638

Clements, D. H. (1994). The uniqueness of the computer as a learning tool: Insights from research and practice, In Young children: Active learners in a technological age, J. L. Wright & D. D. Shade (Eds.), Washington, DC: NAEYC.

Kumari, M. M. (2020). Educational technology: Advanced way of learning. Supporting Teaching Learning at School. Lucknow: Book Rivers.

Lazar, S. (2015). The importance of educational technology in teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 3(1), 111-114.

Lewis, G. (2004). The internet and young learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lo, J. J. (2013). E-learning readiness in senior high school in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology and Applications, 7(4), 122-132.

Maddux, C. D., Johnson, D. L., & Willis J. W. (2001). Educational computing learning with tomorrow’s technologies (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 95-122.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Bangkok: Ministry of Education.

Schoepp, K. W. (2004). Technology integration barriers in a technology-rich environment: A CBAM perspective (Unpublished master’s thesis), University of Calgary, Alberta.

Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 19(2), 105.

Sulaimani, A. O., Sarhandi, P. S. A., & Buledi, M. H. (2017). Impact of CALL in-house professional development training on teachers’ pedagogy: An evaluative study. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-12.

Syathroh, I. L. (2020). A study on Indonesian teachers’ use of technology in English language teaching. Journal of Educational Experts (JEE), 3(1), 1-12.

Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2017). Pedagogies across subjects: What are preservice teachers’ TPACK patterns of integrating technology in practice? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(3), 346-373.

Watson Todd, R. W. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the shift from the classroom to online teaching. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 4-17.